Motion theory Nike one

1STaVEMACHINE

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VxcfmMtpvI[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VkMHsN8SoI[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04hDmXW0fXg[/youtube]

Special effects

some interesting special effects by

http://www.motiontheory.com/

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUCsaRBPohI[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PuyZglg0_Rs&NR=1[/youtube]

ubiquitous computing?

verletChain test 02

verletChain test 01

Research: nanwebbers

This is a awesome animation where a form generates with music.
Kelly you might find this useful to look at for some idea’s about generative form as a reaction to a stimulus.

<embed src="200_Nanowebbers.mov" width="320" height="255">

link
by "Semiconductor" 

Also check out the "world in flux" DVD if you get a min

Proposal tentative;

The world around us is full of rich complex and amazing living things and living systems.  

The building blocks of virtual worlds are currently based on hollow polygon clad pieces of code, but polygons will not be the building blocks of the future.

 How will we sense and perceive living things in a digital or augmented reality?

Does evolving and not designing worlds completely leave a element of surprise for the individual? In the future could we explore digitaly evolved planets inhabited by rich diverse ecosystems of data?

What is dna in the virtual? 
what is evolution in the digital?

Does a digital biology have to obey physics? could more abstract concepts be used as rules? Digital that organisms that evolve based on human emotion?

The body without organs

“When you will have made him a body without organs,
then you will have delivered him from all his automatic reactions
and restored him to his true freedom.”

^ Antonin Artaud. “To Have Done with the Judgment of God” in Antonin Artaud Selected Writings. Susan Sontag (ed). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1976, p. 571.
In Deleuze’s work, the term initially refers to the “virtual” dimension of the body. For Deleuze and Guattari, every “actual” body has (or expresses) a set of traits, habits, movements, affects, etc. But every “actual” body also has a “virtual” dimension, a vast reservoir of potential traits, connections, affects, movements, etc. This collection of potentials is what Deleuze calls the BwO. To “make oneself a body without organs,” then, is to actively experiment with oneself to draw out and activate these virtual potentials. These potentials are mostly activated (or “actualized”) through conjunctions with other bodies (or BwOs) that Deleuze calls “becomings.”

Deleuze and Guattari use the term BwO in an extended sense, to refer to the virtual dimension of reality in general (which they more often call “plane of consistency” or “plane of immanence”). In this sense, they speak of a BwO of “the earth.” “The Earth,” they write, “is a body without organs. This body without organs is permeated by unformed, unstable matters, by flows in all directions, by free intensities or nomadic singularities, by mad or transitory particles” (A Thousand Plateaus, p. 40). That is, we usually think of the world as composed of relatively stable entities (“bodies,” beings). But these bodies are really composed of sets of flows moving at various speeds (rocks and mountains as very slow-moving flows; living things as flows of genetic material; language as flows of information, words, etc.). This fluid substratum is what Deleuze calls the BwO in a general sense.

In A Thousand Plateaus, Deleuze and Guattari eventually differentiate between three kinds of BwO: cancerous, empty, and full. Roughly, the empty BwO is the BwO of Anti-Oedipus. This BwO is also described as “catatonic” because it is completely de-organ-ized; all flows pass through it freely, with no stopping, and no directing. Even though any form of desire can be produced on it, the empty BwO is non-productive. The full BwO is the healthy BwO; it is productive, but not petrified in its organ-ization. The cancerous BwO is caught in a pattern of endless reproduction of the self-same pattern.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_without_organs

“world as composed of relatively stable entities (“bodies,” beings). But these bodies are really composed of sets of flows moving at various speeds (rocks and mountains as very slow-moving flows; living things as flows of genetic material; language as flows of information, words, etc.)”

“For Deleuze and Guattari, every “actual” body has (or expresses) a set of traits, habits, movements, affects, etc. But every “actual” body also has a “virtual” dimension, a vast reservoir of potential traits, connections, affects, movements, etc.”

“This may be very interesting to look into as a mind in the virtual may be like a body without organ”

Beutiful data

Eno Henze: The Human Factor

Beautiful colour and line, implies movement ?

What is this based on?

Are these fractals ?

quote:

“Creating beutiful [sic] images to impress people is relatively easy, while making visualizations to explore, enable profound insights, and see the invisible, is extremely harder and requires a lot more devotion than this.” – Enrico Bertini